The dress is a walking ad for Truly Victorian, although I heavily modified the bodice pattern so that it barely resembles the original. This was mainly due to yardage constraints. I had two yards and the pattern called for four! I also had some fitting issues (darn bust to waist ratio!) that I should have taken care of earlier because the TV patterns have a special sizing system that allows you to take that into account. However, my ingenious betrothed suggested I do a stomacher front. Ta-da! Problem solved! The stomacher is sewn to one side of the bodice and pins shut on the other. Skirt and bustle underneath are also TV patterns. I got a lot of "Great bustle!" and "Can I take a picture of the side/back?". But I want an even BIGGER bustle now! Although I think with a fuller and longer skirt in the future, I can have an even larger look.
Not too many "just dress" pictures to show you all the aspects of the dress, but I hope you can get a good idea from these!
ETA: Here's a few more! From "Mr. Muggles"
(Bleh, my skirt is getting smushed by a bush! Ignore that! :P)
Photo from M. Jennings
5 comments:
I love your gown! It fits you beautifully. Did you use TV 101 or TV 108 for your bustle? Just curious, since I'm hoping to make a bustle gown, and love the silhouette your bustle gives.
I'm really confused by the spoon...
I was thinking she was trying to bend it using telekinesis.
Stunning! but then everything you do is stunning. /LOVE
@costume diva: i used the TV101 but the trick is that i cut out the actual bustle portion in the largest possible size, while the rest of the petticoat is in my size. i wanted maximum bustle! this did not create any kind of problem as far as constructing both parts in two (very) different sizes, either! i just had to remember to order the right size boning.
@katie and stephanie ann: yes, i was using teleknesis to bend the spoon! we got to see an awesome magic show and i was very inspired! ;)
@lauren: thank you so much!! :D
Post a Comment